So, yeah, I sketched this in pencil, colored it on the computer, printed it, and gave it to my mother. It was wonderful to hear her laughter echoing through the house!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c282b/c282b1f0902ebfbf17feeaadfd973ece935912ec" alt=""But why bunnies? It hardly seems your area of expertise!" Well… Flashback: Frank is shown as a stringy teenager showing a drawing to a woman with thick arms. He says, "Hey mom, look what I made for–" "EUGH!" reacs the woman in revulsion. "Vermin!""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/613da/613daa3317943090ecd388b2d2707e8021e83eff" alt="No reason."
Artist's notes
Argh! I hate drawing stringy teenagers! And yes, I know rabbits don't have thumbs!Now that I've got that out of my system, I can tell you that I was trying to go for the "every hair of his fur is visible" effect that I created for the Twitter drawing. Of course, I soon realize I was going to run out of Mother's Day and not have the drawing finished. What you see here is actually the result of a series of happy accidents.
I started coloring the drawings in Fireworks
Having her vectorized allowed me to add some computer-calculated shading to her which, while it wasn't exactly what I wanted, did save me some time. I touched it up in fireworks, but unfortunately, you could see where the computer-calculated shading ended, and mine began. I decided to use this to my advantage and made it the individual locks of fur. I the repeated the process for the whining bunny.
For his siblings, I did the coloring entirely in Fireworks. While doing his sister (the one that looks curiously in his direction) I lost the color I was using due to a slip of the mouse. Since I had been applying it with a 60% transparency (to allow the underlying paper to still be visible), I couldn't just select it and use it again. But I looked at what I had: the toes had been left white, as had the finger tips. This was a valid coloring for a bunny! I fixed her up (i.e. erased the color from the few toes that had received it) and left her like that.
Of course, having done that, I couldn't have the little rascal be a solid color, so I gave him those spots. I still wonder about that decision though.
For the rest, I have to express my gratitude to Dirk Tiede for posting his study of paws; I hadn't understood how they worked until now.
You captured some pretty good expressions on them. I like the right one best.
ReplyDeleteThe third youngling from the left (the spotted one) at first looked like something off of a doctor's office poster, (to my semi-colour-blind eyes) the brown patches seeming to be muscle and the white to be bone. (I'm hoping that sentence isn't as hard to read as I think it is, given information-cramming.)
ReplyDeleteYes, I get it: the color is so dark it looks like a skull. As I said, the color was more of a dubious afterthought than a design decision. You can see what he looked like before I colored him.
ReplyDelete